Tuesday, October 15, 2013

covert CIA operative? really??

BOMBSHELL! Jim Garrow Reveals Career As Covert CIA Operative...

Now the End Begins
7 October 2013

"In addition to revealing that Andrew Breitbart had been killed under orders from Obama administration officials, he also said that spy thriller novelist Tom Clancy had also be[en] killed in much the same way, and for the same reasons. "

[Read more...]

I had had a feeling something was a bit too 'off,' even in the virtual world I travel now, replete with what are called 'conspiracy theories' now, but once might have been the stuff of those 'newspapers' you still see on the grocer aisles: Martian landed in my back yard! With photos!

To be sure, where the line divides on what may indeed one day prove to have been 'real' all along is not so easy now. Not when even Congress has been asking why particular groups in the government are buying such huge amounts of ammunition...

Mr. Garrow's name, however (the doctorate is honorary; I won't point out that it may be questionable as well), kept coming up in a number of sites I read on a fairly regular basis, and all with glowing accounts of the man and his biography. Nobel Peace Prize nominee. Renowned author and humanitarian. Founder of The Pink Pagoda, a rescue mission for Chinese female babies.

But covert CIA spy?

Tonight, settling down to listen to a twenty-one minute video interview with the man, Mr. Garrow gave a few details that I knew I could backtrack.

Imagine my surprise when I turned up these!

The last article both incorporates the review posted above and spins that Mr. Garrow is a product of a "Zionist Trail.' The article is noteworthy (if you bypass the rant), however, because it lists exactly what I discovered when I began researching Mr. Garrow. He is quite a presence on conservative sites.

Some of them very well-known conservative sites.

A great many of the alternative journalists speak of Mr. Garrow as an old and respected friend.

Many stories that get a lot of press in the conservative/patriot sites (those I read, but as yet often still must call 'fantastical') circle ad infinitum through other sites, and perhaps gain in stature (believability?) as they roll through the sites—how many of these stories are made of the same sort of looseness with facts?

I've asked this question before, and the answer, unfortunately, is not that we can trust all that we are seeing on the evening news...

But are we left with only what we can see with our own eyes?

Trust is at such a low premium these days.

This, however, if the most cautiously laid-out information on Mr. Garrow should prove true, is most distressing. The ease with which we are led like lambs to slaughter saddens...

A well-said cautionary note
From an anti-conservative voice (a bit spicy)
The Behtune Institute

No comments:

Post a Comment